Sunday, January 11, 2009

HARROD'S CREEK BRIDGE: A POLITICAL EFFORT IN FUTILITY?

The Harrod's Creek Bridge issue continues to grow bigger and seems to be yet one more example of Abramson control gone amok. Let's review some background for those unfamiliar with the situation.

Harrod's Creek Bridge is a one lane bridge. A throwback to a different time in our history and yet one that many believe should be preserved. Myself among them. With that being said the bridge has always been functional and has thousands of cars pass over it practically daily. With this in mind some have argued that they would prefer a larger bridge at least 2 lanes at that location.

Seems now Abramson is going to keep the bridge shut down for no apparent reason.

The week of Thanksgiving a car was travelling over the bridge and wrecked into the guardrail creating an obvious safety hazard that needed repaired right away. The bridge itself was closed on Thanksgiving eve forcing a quagmire for travellers for the Thanksgiving holiday.

No problem with this story yet right? Metro did the right thing and closed the bridge assumedly until repairs could be made to insure safety of travellers.

The problem today is the repairs have not been done.

I first became aware of this story back in December from the WAVE3 Hot Button segments by Steve Langford. WAVE 3 TV Louisville, KY Video The Hot Button editorial by Steve Langford basically admonishes River Fields for filing a lawsuit against Metro for not reopening the bridge.

In this case I disagree with Mr. Langford for his admonishment. Let's look at things from a different perspective like this response from Don Cox to Langford's editorial: WAVE 3 TV Louisville, KY Video

Therein lies the rest of the story. The people of Harrod's Creek who use the bridge are being made to suffer for no reason. According to Mr. Cox there are 2 guardrails set in place to block people from using the bridge. It would seem easier to repair the bridge using one of them wouldn't it? How many guardrails are hit and damaged from accidents all the time. Do we close down every road because of it or do we fix it so people can travel on the taxpayer paid for right of way.

Mr. Langford falls for the line by Abramson that the bridge is unsafe, (duh it has a guardrail damaged of course it is), and Abramson says we cannot get federal funding to replace it because it is only a one lane bridge.

Excuse me folks but does this sound like it should be this kind of a problem? Do we really need to spend more money defending a lawsuit that should not have been forced to use as an option to get things done?

This is just one more absurd example of poor leadership and decision making by Abramson. While we know he likes to continue hemorrhaging money defending lawsuits so his buddies can make money on us it is absurd that he will spend more money defending this suit than the actual cost of doing the right thing.

Fix the dang guardrail on the existing bridge!

If you want to go for federal dollars to build a new one have fun with that. We have only been touting a couple of new bridges for as many years as I can remember, like an east end bridge or a new downtown bridge, so why not?

Maybe he thinks that by forcing this asinine situation he will get enough funding to build a little 2 lane bridge at the Harrod's Creek Bridge location so he can spin in the next election how he was able to get funding for a new bridge when people said we couldn't. That scenario is almost so ridiculous it isn't even funny. More ridiculous is the thought he is arrogant enough to try and pull that line off.

Not only are people having problems commuting back and forth the City is also losing money because of it. When the businesses are losing business income because of this fiasco there are no taxes paid to the City from that business. Lost business is lost tax revenue that Abramson says we need.

Is this a fiscally responsible approach considering Abramson continues to tell everyone we have a budget "crisis?"

SO let's recap a bit.

We now are going to spend money we don't have for a situation we really shouldn't have all thanks to this arrogant Mayor and his "visions" for what he wants.

Who benefits? His personal stable of attorneys who will defend the lawsuit with money we don't have once again. Yet another expense that is unnecessary. Really that is about all.

Who loses? We the people once again. The people of Harrod's Creek lose for obvious reasons. The people throughout Metro lose when we have to pick up the tab for even less revenue thanks to lost business from this fiasco. The area overall loses historic value.

So is there more to the story here? Is Jerry trying to pull another fast one over us by trying to steal some land and development we do not need by starving the area of business? Who knows.

Could the insurance company of the driver of the car be forced to pay for the damage to repair the bridge thus negating any cost to the City for repairs?

Anyone want to speculate on why this idiocy continues in Metro?

I await your response.

3 comments:

  1. Who IS actually defending the lawsuit - it should be the county attorney's office. The merger statute specifically said that only the CA can represent the city.

    And of course, they could go after the driver's insurance, but that is something the city rarely does.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This idiocy continues because We The People for too long have ignored every wish and want that this mayor wants. We've allowed the mayors office to be a place where special interests get their cases heard and allowed to proceed with no input from the public. Excuse me but I have to say that this mayor does not give a darn about the people of Louisville. He's just saying this for fancy reasons and trying to get re elected every term.

    Otherwise, any rational and thinking individual would start saying what the hades is wrong here? They would actually wonder what these people are doing with all of this money that should have been allocated for projects such as these and not the latest fix up downtown scheme that is doomed to fail. The arena will be a boondoogle for the local populace because someone else will have to pay for it yet the taxpaying public will have to foot the bill and cover the budget deficits.

    Don't tell me how this is going to revitalize downtown because over the past 30 years it still hasn't ever done anything because the people that go downtown then haul off later and run back down the way to Dixie Hwy, Hurstbourne, Preston, Outer Loop and whereever to get a bite to eat. Lets face it that this city is very much spread out and the main downtown core is not going to take off like they envisioned.

    Indianapolis, Cincinnati, and a lot of other places have similar issues with people not wanting to be downtown. Unfortunately this is caused by crime and violence and not someone just being scared of the dark. The perception is no different than Louisville. People in Louisville for years have avoided the downtown area and they will continue to do so. The only real entertainment downtown for anyone past dark is going out to eat, listen to music, or getting drunk. Thats nothing special considering that I can listen to my stereo, MP3 player, home computer, etc and listen to music most any time.

    Eventually under their plan there will be an oversaturation of restaurants, bars, etc downtown which will make business more scarce for the existing establishments. Eventually those locally owned establishments suffer from this arcane form of urban development.

    Jerry thinks that a prosperous city is one that focuses on retail, bars, restaurants, and bookstores. Not on that produces cars, parts, chairs, ladders, household goods, computer software, and production oriented enterprises. His idea is that the majority of the population will survive on his agenda of twisted development. The people here need to get rid of this joker soon or otherwise, how many more job losses and lack of development we can sustain.

    ReplyDelete
  3. FIX THE BRIDGE!!!!!!!!!! traffic sucks in the mornings!

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for reading LNP. Open and honest discussions of local politics and relevant issues is important to voter understanding. Please listen to the "Ed Springston Show". We broadcast Monday through Thursday evenings at 7 PM on local media outlets. Please check for the links.
Yours truly,
Ed Springston

9/11 Twenty-One Years later....

This will not be the post you expect from the headline. Fair warning..... Most remember the events of 9/11. How anyone could forget I have n...