Louisville, KY - It would appear that Louisville Metro Council Democrats are acting illegally in regards to open meetings laws. In my opinion the County Attorney's office just confirmed it.
It seems the Courier Journal did a story today on email exchanges between Council members but may have opened up a serious question about just how Council business is conducted behind the scenes.
Take the following for example:
"Assistant County Attorney Bill O'Brien cautioned council members
early this month that an email he was copied on could have Open Meetings
Law ramifications when policy issues are discussed and debated in phone
conferences and in general emails or text.
"The court could
consider this type of communication a non-public meeting in violation of
OML," wrote O'Brien, who has since retired. "Please refrain from
general council business in your group emails.""
What makes this so interesting is that we have been shown proof of Metro Council members presumably conducting business through personal email but it is very hard to prove to what extent since those same emails are not subject to open records laws.
I don't make that claim lightly but offer this as one example of proof.
But we must go even further with the logic of illegality by the Metro Council Democrats based on this from the County Attorney's office as well:
Assistant County Attorney Paul Guagliardo responded in a Sept. 18
letter that indicated the original email correspondence did not violate
the law. King forward the findings to fellow council members last week.
said there is no definite test of when emails could violate the law and
that "Every situation is fact-dependent," but outlined some scenarios
for council members.
Council members could email each other to
attend a University of Louisville football game and tailgate, for
example, but then a quorum, or a majority of the council members, could
not discuss a city matter that is set to come before them.
quorum could email each other about the spread of the Ebola virus in
Africa but could not email each other about boosting the budget for the
health department to assist in purchasing medical gear in the event the
virus reaches Louisville.
"Council members can probably
communicate by email to confirm their availability for a special
meeting," Guagliardo wrote. "We are less certain about email
correspondence among a quorum of members to discuss language in a
The more council members who are included
initially in the email about "public business" increases the likelihood
that, if challenged, the communication could be determined to be in
violation, the attorney wrote.
In a contradiction from his colleague within the County Attorney's office, Guagliardo declared that the emails were legal yet one glaring problem remains.
What is being discussed within the Metro Council Democratic caucus meetings?
Consider that a quorum is defined as a majority of Council members, and Democrats control the majority of the Council seats, then by definition their own caucus constitutes a quorum and any business discussed is subject to open meetings laws.
Of course the assumed answer by the Caucus will be that their meetings are open to the public but you must ask, how that is so?
They meet in a limited space environment that really precludes anyone attending outside of caucus members and their aides which greatly negates the possibility of any "open" meetings. This of course could be rectified by holding their Caucus meeting in the Metro Chamber itself which has plenty of room but it will not happen.
Of course since their quorum is required to be open to the public then any Republican Council member would have the same right to attend and that will not be allowed.
The ironic thing is the Republican Caucus can legally meet anytime they want as they cannot constitute a quorum based on their limited membership
We know that there are many closed door dealings and illegally used personal email accounts as evidenced above, but how much more is being done that we don't know about?
Thanks to the County Attorney's office we can now begin to demand answers.....
Listen daily from 7-8pm at The Ed Springston Show. Also visit Louisville Politics for more details and in depth coverage of local political and news issues.
The Metro removal hearing case against Dan Johnson ended about the way it began. With many in disbelief. I could not understand how the &q...
Local developer and activist Chris Thieneman has filed a lawsuit against the City of Louisville, LMPD Officers, and County Attorney Ingrid...
Ford has recently settled a harassment and discrimination case in Chicago. The Chicago Assembly and Stamping plants settled for $10.1 milli...
(Correction: This article has been updated to correct the lobby spending by Quinn. Total lobby spending during the years mentioned includes ...