In the interest of fairness I have to make a disclaimer here. I have become a Paulbot of sorts in the GOP primary for President. Sue me but it is becoming hard to be objective in this race anymore. Tonight's South Carolina GOP debate proved once again just why Ron Paul is the class of the field.
Is he as articulate as say Newt Gingrich? Nope. Is he young like Rick Santorum? Nope. Does he look the part of the traditional Conservative Republican like Mitt Romney does? Nope.
Is he as articulate as say Newt Gingrich? Nope. Is he young like Rick Santorum? Nope. Does he look the part of the traditional Conservative Republican like Mitt Romney does? Nope.
But there is something. Something undefined in any other candidate in this
race. Character. So how do you define character?
Here is a dictionary reference to character:
char·ac·ter noun
Here is a dictionary reference to character:
char·ac·ter noun
2. one such feature or trait; characteristic.
3. moral or ethical
quality:
a man of fine,
honorable character.
5. reputation: a stain on one's character.
Perhaps numbers 3 and 4 sum up Ron Paul
well. One thing that none of the other candidates have had the audacity to do is
question the character of the man Ron Paul. While all have challenged the
integrity of each other none have even come close to challenging the integrity
of Ron Paul.
That in itself speaks volumes.