Weather updates: While I like many others go on a rant against the CJ for not doing the hard investigative work somany of us now do you have to give credit where credit is due. With the ongoing rains, flooding, and expected more of the same throughout the day today the CJ has done a nice job reporting on street closures and problem areas in today's online edition. You can read it here:
Flood warning in Louisville; several accidents on interstates courier-journal.com The Courier-Journal
Remember the Kensington group scam report I did: You can read about it here. Louisville News and Politics: THE KENSINGTON GROUP SCAMMING LOCAL INVESTORS? Apparently the folks involved felt compelled from this article to start playing the "your money will be in your hands this week" game again. Of course the same old usual results.
No money and continued lies and deception. This coming week I will expose even more of the scam and the players involved. This will lead to a lawsuit using federal laws including RICO. We must rid ourselves of the scum that would lie, cheat, and steal people out of their money for their own gain.
MAYORAL ELECTION: As previously stated here Chris Thieneman has tried to get the message out for years about the pay to play scheme with no one willing to take him up on it. This has been ongoing since 2001 and this week I will show the evidence trail. Additionally more will be forthcoming involving Jim King, AG Jack Conway, and Steve Beshear.
Stay tuned and enjoy the ride it is going to be interesting.......
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Friday, April 30, 2010
IS DISTRICT 13 COUNCILWOMAN VICKIE WELCH IN MORE TROUBLE?
Yep I know bold headline but the following is very interesting and very telling. I received this poll on the District 13 race from River City Polling and found it interesting to say the least. For the record I have not verified whether Vickie took trips with those mentioned in this poll but based on history it probably did happen.
Open records will let us know. In the meantime check it out. There were 4 questions asked and all were yes or no questions. Here is the poll:
We are conducting an automated political poll for this May's Democratic Metro Council primary.
It takes less than a minute, and there are only four questions:
First question, are you a registered Democrat likely to vote in the May primary?
To answer yes, please press 1.
To answer no, please press 2;
Again, if you are a registered Democrat likely to vote in the May primary press 1, if not, press 2.
Second question, if the Democrat primary for Metro Council was today for whom would you vote?
There are two candidates: to vote for Vicki Welch, press 3; to vote for Larry Roger Price, press 4.
Again to vote for Vicki Welch, press 3; to vote for Larry Roger Price, press 4.
Third question, would you change your vote if you were given proof that Vicki Welch had voted to give millions of taxpayer dollars to organizations like the League of Cities and GLI and then took luxury trips with them? Again, if you were given proof that Vicki Welch had voted to give millions of taxpayer dollars to organizations like the League of Cities and GLI and then took luxury trips with them, would you change your vote? Please press 3 if you would change your vote; please press 4 if you would not change your vote.
Last question, would you change your vote if you were given proof that Vicki Welch had been using taxpayer money to campaign for Metro Council? Again, if you were given proof that Vicki Welch had been using taxpayer money to campaign for Metro Council, would you change your vote? Please press 5 if you would change your vote; please press 6 if you would not change your vote.
"This concludes our poll, thank you for your time".
The results:
Welch faces significant primary battle given her spending and voting record!
Who would you support tomorrow:
Price 201 (33%) Not out of line with typical non-incumbent
Welch 411 (67%)
Would you change your vote if given proof Welch took trips with GLI/League of Cities:
327 Change Vote
Price 528 (86%)
Welch 84 (14%)
Would you change vote if given proof Welch campaigned on tax payer money?
300 Changed Vote
Price 501 (82%)
Welch 111 (18%)
612 people responding to poll. Democrat voters likely to vote in this May's primary. This weekend from Friday 4/22 to Sunday 4/25.
The interesting thing is the changes when the 3rd and 4th questions are answered. If proven Welch is in serious trouble. Open records will help us prove or disprove this either way.
Your thoughts?
Open records will let us know. In the meantime check it out. There were 4 questions asked and all were yes or no questions. Here is the poll:
We are conducting an automated political poll for this May's Democratic Metro Council primary.
It takes less than a minute, and there are only four questions:
First question, are you a registered Democrat likely to vote in the May primary?
To answer yes, please press 1.
To answer no, please press 2;
Again, if you are a registered Democrat likely to vote in the May primary press 1, if not, press 2.
Second question, if the Democrat primary for Metro Council was today for whom would you vote?
There are two candidates: to vote for Vicki Welch, press 3; to vote for Larry Roger Price, press 4.
Again to vote for Vicki Welch, press 3; to vote for Larry Roger Price, press 4.
Third question, would you change your vote if you were given proof that Vicki Welch had voted to give millions of taxpayer dollars to organizations like the League of Cities and GLI and then took luxury trips with them? Again, if you were given proof that Vicki Welch had voted to give millions of taxpayer dollars to organizations like the League of Cities and GLI and then took luxury trips with them, would you change your vote? Please press 3 if you would change your vote; please press 4 if you would not change your vote.
Last question, would you change your vote if you were given proof that Vicki Welch had been using taxpayer money to campaign for Metro Council? Again, if you were given proof that Vicki Welch had been using taxpayer money to campaign for Metro Council, would you change your vote? Please press 5 if you would change your vote; please press 6 if you would not change your vote.
"This concludes our poll, thank you for your time".
The results:
Welch faces significant primary battle given her spending and voting record!
Who would you support tomorrow:
Price 201 (33%) Not out of line with typical non-incumbent
Welch 411 (67%)
Would you change your vote if given proof Welch took trips with GLI/League of Cities:
327 Change Vote
Price 528 (86%)
Welch 84 (14%)
Would you change vote if given proof Welch campaigned on tax payer money?
300 Changed Vote
Price 501 (82%)
Welch 111 (18%)
612 people responding to poll. Democrat voters likely to vote in this May's primary. This weekend from Friday 4/22 to Sunday 4/25.
The interesting thing is the changes when the 3rd and 4th questions are answered. If proven Welch is in serious trouble. Open records will help us prove or disprove this either way.
Your thoughts?
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
UPDATES AND SUCH
First it seems I will have some time on my hands again to update you the reader. Dynacraft apparently overestimated their needs for manpower and have started laying off most they recently hired. Yep that includes me. So much for the new job and economic recovery.
Much has been going on lately so I will update a bit here and then get back to more research.
Jim King has gotten some more endorsements and there is much to be said by commentors. Read here: Fraternal Order of Police endorses Hal Heiner, Jim King for Louisville mayor courier-journal.com The Courier-Journal
As the one who brought about the charges against Jim King and fought to ensure it did not get swept under the rug as intended I can assure you that King should not be elected. This case is far from over.
Jim King has several criminal violations being investigated right now by Special Prosecutor Hart Megibben and the Kentucky State Police. This criminal investigation is ongoing and the KREF was just the beginning and only ONE part of the actual case.
Remember IF King wins the primary then is indicted the Mayoral race is over for Democrats.
Jim King is still under CRIMINAL investigation by the Special Prosecutor Hart Megibben AND the Kentucky State Police. For anyone thinking of voting for him remember this. If you elect King and he is found guilty after being indicted and before the General election he cannot serve as a felon. There goes your vote. And you will then have no choice on his replacement in the primary.
If King somehow pulls this off and wins the General election and is convicted then the Metro Council will appoint his replacement. Do you really want to take a chance on that? You can read more about the King spin machine here: Louisville News and Politics: JIM AND KATIE KING $30,000 IN FINES IS JUST THE BEGINNING
Chris Thieneman has been taking some heat for his statements about involvement in a play to pay scheme back in 2000. For years I have been told about pay to play schemes by people who would not use their name for fear of retribution. These stories are from multiple sources and would involve so many prominent people your head will spin.
Thieneman going forward with this during this campaign was an extremely bold risk to take. Though Chris has spoken of this issue previously no one in media ever wanted to pursue it. Now as a Mayoral candidate Chris used that platform to bring it to light. Quite frankly, I am glad Chris came forward with this revelation.
Chris has put his own name and rep on the line to bring it to the forefront. Whether you agree or not this could be the beginning of the end of this travesty of politics here in Louisville. The days of pay to play are numbered and it starts with people like this willing to go public.
The scheme includes those such as Fred Cowan and some have even alluded to Dave Armstrong.
Can anyone say whistleblower?
Commonwealth Attorney Dave Stengel should already be investigating this and pursuing Cowan, which will lead to many others I assure you, but Stengel cannot. Why? Because Stengel himself is bought and paid for by the machine in my opinion. His involvement with the Jim King case, and his lack of fortitude in doing his job accordingly, was a major red flag to me of just how far he is involved.
After Stengel received a loan of more than $500,000 from King's bank, and the rumors of the reasons behind his divorce, it is obvious to many Stengel cannot do his job due to his "obligations" to others instead of those who elected him. You sure can buy a lot of friends with $500,000 can't you?
This will get very interesting to say the least so stay tuned as charges may be forthcoming.
Much has been going on lately so I will update a bit here and then get back to more research.
Jim King has gotten some more endorsements and there is much to be said by commentors. Read here: Fraternal Order of Police endorses Hal Heiner, Jim King for Louisville mayor courier-journal.com The Courier-Journal
As the one who brought about the charges against Jim King and fought to ensure it did not get swept under the rug as intended I can assure you that King should not be elected. This case is far from over.
Jim King has several criminal violations being investigated right now by Special Prosecutor Hart Megibben and the Kentucky State Police. This criminal investigation is ongoing and the KREF was just the beginning and only ONE part of the actual case.
Remember IF King wins the primary then is indicted the Mayoral race is over for Democrats.
Jim King is still under CRIMINAL investigation by the Special Prosecutor Hart Megibben AND the Kentucky State Police. For anyone thinking of voting for him remember this. If you elect King and he is found guilty after being indicted and before the General election he cannot serve as a felon. There goes your vote. And you will then have no choice on his replacement in the primary.
If King somehow pulls this off and wins the General election and is convicted then the Metro Council will appoint his replacement. Do you really want to take a chance on that? You can read more about the King spin machine here: Louisville News and Politics: JIM AND KATIE KING $30,000 IN FINES IS JUST THE BEGINNING
Chris Thieneman has been taking some heat for his statements about involvement in a play to pay scheme back in 2000. For years I have been told about pay to play schemes by people who would not use their name for fear of retribution. These stories are from multiple sources and would involve so many prominent people your head will spin.
Thieneman going forward with this during this campaign was an extremely bold risk to take. Though Chris has spoken of this issue previously no one in media ever wanted to pursue it. Now as a Mayoral candidate Chris used that platform to bring it to light. Quite frankly, I am glad Chris came forward with this revelation.
Chris has put his own name and rep on the line to bring it to the forefront. Whether you agree or not this could be the beginning of the end of this travesty of politics here in Louisville. The days of pay to play are numbered and it starts with people like this willing to go public.
The scheme includes those such as Fred Cowan and some have even alluded to Dave Armstrong.
Can anyone say whistleblower?
Commonwealth Attorney Dave Stengel should already be investigating this and pursuing Cowan, which will lead to many others I assure you, but Stengel cannot. Why? Because Stengel himself is bought and paid for by the machine in my opinion. His involvement with the Jim King case, and his lack of fortitude in doing his job accordingly, was a major red flag to me of just how far he is involved.
After Stengel received a loan of more than $500,000 from King's bank, and the rumors of the reasons behind his divorce, it is obvious to many Stengel cannot do his job due to his "obligations" to others instead of those who elected him. You sure can buy a lot of friends with $500,000 can't you?
This will get very interesting to say the least so stay tuned as charges may be forthcoming.
Sunday, April 25, 2010
ANSWERS TO THE COURIER QUESTIONS
One of the positive things about the CJ is that each election they ask questions of all candidates and post them on their website, and other avenues, to get it to you the voter. I believe everyone of us have the right to know how each candidate responds to these questions. An informed voter is a good voter regardless of which candidate you choose in the election.
Below are the questions submitted to me by the CJ editorial board and my answers for your review:
Q. Why are you the most qualified candidate?
A: I stay involved and work towards change daily not just show up for elections. The recent $30,000 King fines, the highest in known memory throughout the State, are but one example of my involvement in cleaning up Government. This alone was a 2 year process and is ongoing.
Helping get SB64 signed into law, drafting SB 222 to aid Charities throughout our community are others.
Check out my website and you will see the daily dedication and efforts over the years NOT election years only.
Getting to the root of problems, accountability, openness, transparency, honesty, and integrity are my greatest strengths as proven by my work.
Q: What are the most crucial issues, and how would you address them?
A: Job stimulus and education are the top 2 right now. Restructure the current tax system, focus on small business development and growth, starting with our most troubled areas, through the use of microloans is one start. Education needs to be completely revamped starting with the dismantling of KERA and reworking how we prioritize spending.
We have seen over and over the current crop of career elected "leaders" continue to fail us by the same old tired thinking. We must open the door to new ideas to stimulate ourselves.
Q: How should the legislature solve the problem of declining revenues that have forced cuts in education and other state services?
A: Start by doing our jobs. The budget must be the first order of the day not the last thing considered during the session. I propose the budget reaches the House not later than the 3rd week of January each year and the House then immediately reconciles the budget and sends to the Senate.Upon a budget agreement we then know what we have and have not.
Once we have a balanced budget we can then hammer out any extra spending, or pork, based on surpluses.
I also would lower taxes immediately on small business. Offer tax incentives for small business growth and establish the microloan program referred to above.
Q: Do you favor or oppose reforming the state tax system to raise revenue. Why? And taxes would you increase or cut?
A: I believe the state tax system should be reformed so I am in favor of that. The current tax system in place makes Kentucky and our local communities, like mine in District 28, non competitive for new business.
The first thing to cut is, like I have stated above, small business taxes. This business is the lifeblood of our community and the most abused from a tax structure perspective.
Occupational taxes, vehicle taxes are others.
Q: Do you support expanding gambling to allow video slot machines at Kentucky's race tracks?
A: I support expanded gambling in principle because I believe it is a foregone conclusion that gambling is here to stay. With that in mind we continue to send millions out of State each year that we can use for economic stimulus. I do not favor expanded gambling primarily for horse tracks.
I am already involved with this issue working on behalf of charities by co writing SB 222 that would allow expanded gambling and charitable gaming to co exist. The KEEP organization's own spokesman liked the plan then opted out in favor of trying to gain it only at the tracks instead once again. Some legislators are still playing politics with this in hopes of setting themselves up for future office.
This has proven in my eyes, and many others, that the horse industry, and their lobbied legislators, are only interested in their benefit and not that of our communities.
This mindset is unacceptable and will hurt the charities that need help the most. This stalemate has to be resolved.
Q: Would you support legislation that raises Kentucky's dropout age from 16 to 18?
A: Yes. I can see nothing positive being accomplished by someone 16 years old without an education.
Thanks for reading!
Below are the questions submitted to me by the CJ editorial board and my answers for your review:
Q. Why are you the most qualified candidate?
A: I stay involved and work towards change daily not just show up for elections. The recent $30,000 King fines, the highest in known memory throughout the State, are but one example of my involvement in cleaning up Government. This alone was a 2 year process and is ongoing.
Helping get SB64 signed into law, drafting SB 222 to aid Charities throughout our community are others.
Check out my website and you will see the daily dedication and efforts over the years NOT election years only.
Getting to the root of problems, accountability, openness, transparency, honesty, and integrity are my greatest strengths as proven by my work.
Q: What are the most crucial issues, and how would you address them?
A: Job stimulus and education are the top 2 right now. Restructure the current tax system, focus on small business development and growth, starting with our most troubled areas, through the use of microloans is one start. Education needs to be completely revamped starting with the dismantling of KERA and reworking how we prioritize spending.
We have seen over and over the current crop of career elected "leaders" continue to fail us by the same old tired thinking. We must open the door to new ideas to stimulate ourselves.
Q: How should the legislature solve the problem of declining revenues that have forced cuts in education and other state services?
A: Start by doing our jobs. The budget must be the first order of the day not the last thing considered during the session. I propose the budget reaches the House not later than the 3rd week of January each year and the House then immediately reconciles the budget and sends to the Senate.Upon a budget agreement we then know what we have and have not.
Once we have a balanced budget we can then hammer out any extra spending, or pork, based on surpluses.
I also would lower taxes immediately on small business. Offer tax incentives for small business growth and establish the microloan program referred to above.
Q: Do you favor or oppose reforming the state tax system to raise revenue. Why? And taxes would you increase or cut?
A: I believe the state tax system should be reformed so I am in favor of that. The current tax system in place makes Kentucky and our local communities, like mine in District 28, non competitive for new business.
The first thing to cut is, like I have stated above, small business taxes. This business is the lifeblood of our community and the most abused from a tax structure perspective.
Occupational taxes, vehicle taxes are others.
Q: Do you support expanding gambling to allow video slot machines at Kentucky's race tracks?
A: I support expanded gambling in principle because I believe it is a foregone conclusion that gambling is here to stay. With that in mind we continue to send millions out of State each year that we can use for economic stimulus. I do not favor expanded gambling primarily for horse tracks.
I am already involved with this issue working on behalf of charities by co writing SB 222 that would allow expanded gambling and charitable gaming to co exist. The KEEP organization's own spokesman liked the plan then opted out in favor of trying to gain it only at the tracks instead once again. Some legislators are still playing politics with this in hopes of setting themselves up for future office.
This has proven in my eyes, and many others, that the horse industry, and their lobbied legislators, are only interested in their benefit and not that of our communities.
This mindset is unacceptable and will hurt the charities that need help the most. This stalemate has to be resolved.
Q: Would you support legislation that raises Kentucky's dropout age from 16 to 18?
A: Yes. I can see nothing positive being accomplished by someone 16 years old without an education.
Thanks for reading!
Friday, April 23, 2010
MYVIEWMATTERS RADIO SHOW W/ US DEM SENATE CANDIDATE DR. JAMES BUCKMASTER
First an apology is in order. The MyViewMatters Radio Show is usually uploaded each Wednesday night and in this case it is late. For you avid listeners my apologies as I have been extremely time restrained with the campaign efforts in my District 28 House Race, the new job, and keeping up with the blog. The last few months have been challenging to say the least but everything eventually levels out and is now in the process of doing just that. Thanks for your patience.
Wednesday's show was with Dr. James Buckmaster who is running in the Democratic primary against Jack Conway and Dan Mongiardo. I must admit I was somewhat surprised with Dr Buckmaster. Having not known much about him other than the usual periphery glance on candidates there really was not much to look at.
Additionally, our custom is to meet with guests pre show to kind of get a feel for each other and in this case Dr. Buckmaster's schedule did not allow for it. In short this show was a first glance and first meet show with no prep work.
Honestly? It went great.
Dr. Buckmaster is someone who is in touch with the issues of Kentucky, has a great passion for changing the way government is now being run, and sincerely wants your vote.
Tune in below for the show and let us know what you think.
As always thanks for listening.
PS the show will be preempted this Wed April 28 due to WKJK's contractual obligation to air baseball in our time slot. We will return in 2 weeks on May 5. Additionally there will be 1 more week of preempted programming on May 12 for baseball.
Wednesday's show was with Dr. James Buckmaster who is running in the Democratic primary against Jack Conway and Dan Mongiardo. I must admit I was somewhat surprised with Dr Buckmaster. Having not known much about him other than the usual periphery glance on candidates there really was not much to look at.
Additionally, our custom is to meet with guests pre show to kind of get a feel for each other and in this case Dr. Buckmaster's schedule did not allow for it. In short this show was a first glance and first meet show with no prep work.
Honestly? It went great.
Dr. Buckmaster is someone who is in touch with the issues of Kentucky, has a great passion for changing the way government is now being run, and sincerely wants your vote.
Tune in below for the show and let us know what you think.
As always thanks for listening.
PS the show will be preempted this Wed April 28 due to WKJK's contractual obligation to air baseball in our time slot. We will return in 2 weeks on May 5. Additionally there will be 1 more week of preempted programming on May 12 for baseball.
Sunday, April 18, 2010
SPRINGSTON RECEIVES EVEN MORE ENDORSEMENTS
I was informed today that I have been endorsed by Take Back Kentucky and Take Back Louisville. Both organizations work very hard to get us back to our Constitutional beliefs and empower we the people.
It is with great pride that I accept both.
The fight for freedom is one that we must continue to fight daily and diligently. No more can we stand aside and allow our voices to go unheard.
Many thanks to each and everyone of the members of Take Back Kentucky and Take Back Louisville. I will work diligently everyday to ensure our rights are protected and preserve our freedom.
It is an honor to be thought of so highly by these organizations.
It is with great pride that I accept both.
The fight for freedom is one that we must continue to fight daily and diligently. No more can we stand aside and allow our voices to go unheard.
Many thanks to each and everyone of the members of Take Back Kentucky and Take Back Louisville. I will work diligently everyday to ensure our rights are protected and preserve our freedom.
It is an honor to be thought of so highly by these organizations.
Friday, April 16, 2010
COUNCILMAN KELLY DOWNARD ENDORSES SPRINGSTON

Sometimes in life we get surprised and today was one of those times for me. Metro Councilman Kelly Downard sent the letter above endorsing my campaign for State House District 28. What makes this so special and interesting is that Councilman Downard and I were on opposing sides during the 2006 Mayoral race.
This endorsement for me proves once again that many of us can work through our differences towards the greater goal of bettering our community.
Since the 2006 election I have had the privilege of being able to speak with Councilman Downard many times about problems here in Louisville and found myself siding with him on several issues. The commitment Councilman Downard has towards bettering our community is a tireless one.
I have followed Councilman Downard over the years and have to say he is a rare person in our political world. He is one Councilman I have the utmost respect for and appreciate him for all he has done and continues to do for our community each day.
To receive an endorsement from any sitting elected official during a primary is to say the least very rare.
While knowing Councilman Downard's policy of not endorsing during primary campaigns, and then receiving this endorsement, is to say the least very humbling and it is with great pride that I am honored beyond words and offer my sincerest thanks for this. I look forward to working with Councilman Downard on the issues facing Louisville and working in Frankfort to help us better our community.
Many thanks Councilman. I will do my best to uphold the trust you have put in me with this public endorsement as I will always work to uphold that trust for all I seek to represent.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
9/11 Twenty-One Years later....
This will not be the post you expect from the headline. Fair warning..... Most remember the events of 9/11. How anyone could forget I have n...
-
Constable David Whitlock shoots unarmed woman Jefferson County Constable David Whitlock shot an alleged shoplifter at Wal Mart in River...
-
I was recently asked by some sportsmen why the Jim Strader Hunting and Fishing expo was not being held this year. Though I am an avid gun ri...
-
Apparently neither mind ethics violations for campaign purposes. On Saturday Councilwoman Vickie Welch had advertised a coffee with her Dis...